trump

Vought is rumoured to be about to take over running the Department of Government Efficiency (Doge) from Musk. Dr Dafydd Townley explains.

Dafydd Townley

While Elon Musk has clearly been a major influence on the Trump administration, the less well known, but arguably more influential, power behind the presidency is Russell (usually Russ) Vought. Vought is the director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) 鈥 the nerve centre of the administration鈥檚 sweeping changes.

Vought is to take over running the Department of Government Efficiency (Doge) from Musk.

Unlike Musk, Vought acts mostly outside the media spotlight. He is fully committed to a radical overhaul of the way the US presidency works 鈥 and his deep religious convictions have led him to believe there should be more Christianity embedded in government and public life.

He has to 鈥渂e the person that crushes the deep state鈥, and was part of the first Trump administration, where he held the position of OMB deputy director 鈥 and, briefly, director.

Vought in his first term on , which aimed to reclassify thousands of policy jobs within the federal government. This was designed to allow the White House to quickly change who was employed in these roles.

This was subsequently revoked by the Biden administration. But Trump issued a similar in January, which will implement quicker hiring and firing procedures. The Office of Personnel Management that this could affect 50,000 federal roles.

In an with conservative commentator and podcaster Tucker Carlson, Vought said that this was necessary for the White House to 鈥渞etain control鈥 of the agencies under its command. Without it, he claimed, ideological 鈥渙pponents鈥 within the agencies had the power to diminish the efficiency of White House initiatives. And his role as head of the OMB, he argued, was 鈥渢o tame the bureaucracy, the administrative state鈥.

During the Biden presidency, Vought was one of the main authors 鈥 credited as the key architect 鈥 of the Heritage Foundation鈥檚 influential , widely seen as the blueprint for Trump鈥檚 second term of office. The 900-page document, whose full title is Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, was a major talking point during last year鈥檚 presidential election campaign.

Throughout the campaign, Trump strenuously Democrat accusations of having any connection to Project 2025. But a large number of his appointees contributed to the Heritage Foundation鈥檚 publication, and numerous have quickly . These include Trump鈥檚 high trade tariffs and Doge鈥檚 cost-cutting initiatives.

During his confirmation hearing in the US Senate, Vought his belief that the White House has authority over federal spending, not Congress. This contradicts article I, section 8, of the , which grants Congress the power to tax and spend for the general welfare of the country.

For the majority of constitutional experts, the executive (the president) may propose a budget, but it is Congress that authorises it.

Concerned by this, Democrats on the Senate budget committee attempted a of Vought鈥檚 confirmation vote, which failed when all 11 Repubican members voted in favour. And when the call came on the Senate floor to confirm his appointment, all 47 Democratic senators held an in protest.

Democrat and Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer the 鈥渕ost radical nominee鈥 with 鈥渢he most extreme agenda鈥 and said that Americans needed to understand the danger he poses to them in their daily lives.

Vought鈥檚 involvement in Project 2025

When asked to compare the Trump administration鈥檚 policies to Project 2025, Paul Dans, who was the director of Project 2025 until he stepped down during the Trump campaign, that the administration鈥檚 policies were 鈥渂eyond my wildest dreams鈥. According to one tracking the agenda, of the 313 suggested policy objectives in Project 2025, 101 have been implemented, while another 64 are in progress.

A significant number of Project 2025鈥檚 recommendations have been implemented by the Elon Musk-led Doge. And Vought has been by one journalist as 鈥渢he glue between Musk and the Republicans鈥.

Vought and Musk have forged a strange but effective relationship in executing Doge鈥檚 cost-cutting initiatives. According to reports former Trump administration officials, Musk鈥檚 Doge has used data to identify what he considers to be overspending while and Vought鈥檚 OMB has confirmed Doge鈥檚 findings recommending how to deal with them.

鈥淲hat鈥檚 needed is a specific theory about the case and what can be done,鈥 Vought . It was part of an effort to help the government 鈥渂alance its books鈥, he added.

When asked by Tucker Carlson what he thought of Doge, Vought : 鈥淚 think they鈥檙e bringing an exhilarating rush 鈥 of creativity, outside the box thinking, comfortability with risk and leverage.鈥

The process to crush the so-called 鈥渄eep state鈥 conducted by Maga Republicans in Congress and Doge in the White House has been expertly coordinated by Vought. As one reporter , he has experience of working on Capitol Hill and is on good terms with the Freedom Caucus who are the group of conservative Republicans that advocates for limited government, fiscal restraint and strict adherence to a constitutional, right-wing agenda.

After the caucus was instrumental in defining the terms of support for Mike McCarthy as Speaker of the House in 2023, Vought the members of Freedom House 鈥渢he lions that have been through battle and won鈥. He knows the capabilities of the OMB 鈥 and is just as anti-establishment as Musk.

According to independent researchers , a number of departments still have more than half of the project鈥檚 objectives to be completed. The administration will need to work quickly, however.

, the party that occupies the White House fares badly in the midterms. The Republicans could lose control of the House or the Senate, both of which they currently control. Should this happen, the administration may find it more difficult to implement the changes they wish.

But it is highly unlikely that this will deter Vought and his drive for reforms of presidential powers. He, along with the majority of the Trump White House, believe in the . This essentially argues that the president has control over all executive branch officials and operations, and that Congress cannot limit that control, even through legislation.

If Vought does carry on and Congress challenges his decisions, the issue could end up in the Supreme Court 鈥 a court dominated by Trump appointees. Any judgment made by the court would be seismic in its importance of future interpretations of the constitution and where power really lies in the federal government.

For Vought and other Project 2025 authors in the administration, a ruling in their favour would be vindication of their work.

, Teaching Fellow in US politics and international security,

This article is republished from under a Creative Commons license. Read the .

More articles from the Conversation